(a) In General. Evidence of a criminal conviction offered to attack a witness’s character for truthfulness must be admitted if:
-
(1) the crime was a felony or involved moral turpitude, regardless of punishment;
-
(2) the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect to a party; and
-
(3) it is elicited from the witness or established by public record.
(b) Limit on Using the Evidence After 10 Years. This subdivision (b) applies if more than 10 years have passed since the witness’s conviction or release from confinement for it, whichever is later. Evidence of the conviction is admissible only if its probative value, supported by specific facts and circumstances, substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect.
(c) Effect of a Pardon, Annulment, or Certificate of Rehabilitation. Evidence of a conviction is not admissible if:
-
(1) the conviction has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, certificate of rehabilitation, or other equivalent procedure based on a finding that the person has been rehabilitated, and the person has not been convicted of a later crime that was classified as a felony or involved moral turpitude, regardless of punishment;
-
(2) probation has been satisfactorily completed for the conviction, and the person has not been convicted of a later crime that was classified as a felony or involved moral turpitude, regardless of punishment; or
-
(3) the conviction has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, or other equivalent procedure based on a finding of innocence.
(d) Juvenile Adjudications. Evidence of a juvenile adjudication is admissible under this rule only if:
-
(1) the witness is a party in a proceeding conducted under title 3 of the Texas Family Code; or
-
(2) the United States or Texas Constitution requires that it be admitted.
(e) Pendency of an Appeal. A conviction for which an appeal is pending is not admissible under this rule.
(f) Notice. Evidence of a witness’s conviction is not admissible under this rule if, after receiving from the adverse party a timely written request specifying the witness, the proponent of the conviction fails to provide sufficient written notice of intent to use the conviction. Notice is sufficient if it provides a fair opportunity to contest the use of such evidence.